Paul
the apostle asked the Jews in Rome, “if the uncircumcision keep
the righteousness of the law,
shall
not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?”,
and in chapter two and verse twenty-seven of Romans, Paul shared
about people who, “by the letter and circumcision do
transgress the law” where we read:
And
shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfill the law,
judge
you, who by the letter and circumcision do transgress the law?
The
verse begins, “And shall not uncircumcision which is by
nature, if it fulfill the law, ...”
Paul began with the word, “and shall not”
which means “will not” “uncircumcision” which
means “the person's condition in which the corrupt desires rooted
in the flesh were not yet extinct” “which is by nature”
or “that exists with the force of laws and sum of innate properties
and power by which one person differs from others, distinctive native
peculiarities and natural characteristics of strength, ferocity and
intractability”, “if it fulfill” which
means “when it is brought to a close, finished, put to an end and
complete” “the law”
or “of the rule which make producing a state approved of God”.
Paul considered the “natural order” of “uncircumcision”
when it “closes, puts to an end and completes” God's “law”.
The
verse continues, “... judge you, who by the letter and
circumcision do transgress the law?” Paul
added the words, “judge you” which
means “separate, put asunder, pick out, select, choose, approve,
esteem and prefer”, “who by the letter”
or “the person who through any writing, note, document or record”
“and circumcision” which
means “the Jews' the act or rite of the cutting away of the
foreskin which represents the extinction of passions and the removal
of spiritual impurity” “do transgress”
or “break and violate” “the law”
which refers to “of the rule which make producing a state approved
of God”. Paul desired for the “Jews” of whom he wrote who had
the “law” to make
a judgment as to whether circumcised people who “violate and break”
God's “law”
“fulfill the law” or
not.
When
we consider these words of Paul, we see how he meant to show how a
person who keeps God's law and is “uncircumcised” compares
to a person who is “circumcised” but does not keep “God's
law”. Paul's question was directed to the “Jews” who
had the law to judge, and the implication is that those who keep the
law are more in line with the will of God than an outward
“circumcision” or lack thereof. Jesus Christ came to save
both “Jew and Gentile”, and whether a person is
“circumcised” or not has no bearing upon their need for
His salvation. Those who are wise shall know Jesus came to save
everybody, and when they have this knowledge, they should “believe
and trust” in Him as “Savior and Lord”.
Next
time Paul tells the Jewish people in Rome,
“he
is not a Jew, which is one outwardly”,
so read ahead, and we shall join together then.
Until
tomorrow…there is more…
Look for the daily devotional book “Equipped for Battle – From Generation to Generation”, the marriage book “So, You Want to Be Married”, “One Year in the Sermon on the Mount” and the new poetry book "Random Mushrooms" in all major bookstore sites, http://www.amazon.com ; http://www.barnesandnobles.com ; download to e-books, and find it locally at www.mrzlc.com/bookstore.
Look for the daily devotional book “Equipped for Battle – From Generation to Generation”, the marriage book “So, You Want to Be Married”, “One Year in the Sermon on the Mount” and the new poetry book "Random Mushrooms" in all major bookstore sites, http://www.amazon.com ; http://www.barnesandnobles.com ; download to e-books, and find it locally at www.mrzlc.com/bookstore.
No comments:
Post a Comment